Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2015 23:38:20 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by scania on May 30, 2015 1:18:52 GMT
But neither of them are V-twins, the cover of the magazine confuses me.
Id say both bikes were packed into a comer van to be carried to the photo location and they took off the mirrors for packing then didn't bother to put them back on as they were going to reload the bikes in a few minutes.
|
|
|
|
Post by scania on May 30, 2015 1:19:37 GMT
But neither of them are V-twins, the cover of the magazine confuses me.
Id say both bikes were packed into a comer van to be carried to the photo location and they took off the mirrors for packing then didn't bother to put them back on as they were going to reload the bikes in a few minutes.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2015 1:34:50 GMT
The v-twIn thing did not relate to the road test.... There was a dual headline type of thing going on.  |
|
|
|
Post by wazzbo on May 30, 2015 5:47:12 GMT
They took them off so it would go faster, they should have used a black one.;D
Dave....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2015 7:57:55 GMT
Removed for speed testing I'd guess - note the RD has had its bars turned down , being a silver one the SD doesn't need such "tuning"  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2015 9:40:25 GMT
In the article the b/w shots out on the road show the bikes with RH mirrors fitted, which I think looks worse as the bike looks unbalanced.
They were probably removed for the glossy photo shoot- on the cover pic the SD mirror would have blocked the view of the RD.....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2015 9:44:33 GMT
That's a credible suggestion. I'd have been happy with the view of the Yam obscured though.  |
|
